Versions
v14 :: 0 :: gentoo
- Modified
- License
- GPL-2 GPL-3
- Keywords
- -* amd64 arm arm64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc ~loong ~riscv
v13 :: 0 :: gentoo
- Modified
- License
- GPL-2 GPL-3
- Keywords
- -* amd64 arm arm64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc ~riscv
v12 :: 0 :: gentoo
- Modified
- License
- GPL-2 GPL-3
- Keywords
- -* amd64 arm arm64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc ~riscv
v11 :: 0 :: gentoo
- Modified
- License
- GPL-2 GPL-3
- Keywords
- -* amd64 arm arm64 hppa ppc ppc64 sparc ~riscv
v0_p2021-r1 :: 0 :: gentoo
- Modified
- License
- GPL-2 GPL-3
- Keywords
- -* amd64 x86
Dependencies
dev-libs / gmp : Library for arbitrary-precision arithmetic on different type of numbers
dev-libs / mpc : A library for multiprecision complex arithmetic with exact rounding
dev-libs / mpfr : Library for multiple-precision floating-point computations with exact rounding
Runtime Dependencies
dev-libs / gmp : Library for arbitrary-precision arithmetic on different type of numbers
dev-libs / mpc : A library for multiprecision complex arithmetic with exact rounding
dev-libs / mpfr : Library for multiple-precision floating-point computations with exact rounding
Bugs
- 946653
- dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: slot?
Change logs
- Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add amd64 binaries for 11/12/13
Same chroot as before but tree state at 67eeb6e0867dd39abfd50edefd68d20919bba7e6. Of course, couldn't use crossdev, so rebuilt natively in the chroot w/ FEATURES="buildpkg". They are newer versions of each slot because it necessarily upgraded them to rebuild to get the binpkgs, though. This just leaves x86 which has a similar problem (perhaps I should've chosen a nomultilib stage3 to begin with). Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add 11
Same as fd80b52f6eb59b31526f4e75e834240e60408f0a. No real point in having it in ~arch temporarily either. Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: stabilise 12, 13
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add 13
Same as fd80b52f6eb59b31526f4e75e834240e60408f0a. Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: fix RDEPEND
It's prebuilt so can't be rebuilt against new subslots, of course. Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add 12
No ~loong as GCC 12 didn't support it. Adding older branches to facilitate GCC testing. I originally wasn't going to bother but I'd like to bisect an issue on ARM, so... Built with ::gentoo at 6895c729372e48a5f596abd65cfeb26c178c5b17, same stage3 as before for earlier binaries (stage3-amd64-hardened-systemd-20241214T201851Z). The only quirk is, for `build-ada-bootsraps`, crossdev's behaviour with --gcc to specify certain versions may use unkeyworded GCC in a particular slot (not checked), but easy to reproduce still with the right ::gentoo commit. See https://github.com/thesamesam/sam-gentoo-scripts/blob/2c192ac1461144fb2a2ab83014ad13794e4efc3d/niche/build-ada-bootstraps. Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: strip unsupported CXXFLAGS too
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/938150 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940601 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - WANG Xuerui · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: keyword 14 for ~loong
Passes gcc:14 bootstrap albeit plain `emerge` of sys-devel/gcc:14 with USE=ada failed with circular dep (not trying to satisfy the BDEPEND with dev-lang/ada-bootstrap at all before bailing). Direct `ebuild` invocation worked. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946645 Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <xen0n@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add alpha binary
Same as 8e2955e0eb4d9e00f39f41e4801893429c0ba6e7 but tree state at: ``` Timestamp of repository gentoo: Wed, 01 Jan 2025 19:18:22 +0000 Head commit of repository gentoo: 7221b3f8c7af080380122dadb60808c0a00d1b07 ``` but I haven't done a world upgrade or anything like that from the stage3 as it was. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946650 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: Stabilize 14 sparc, #947257
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: Stabilize 14 arm64, #947257
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: Stabilize 14 arm, #947257
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add hppa1.1 binary
Same environment as described in 8e2955e0eb4d9e00f39f41e4801893429c0ba6e7. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946647 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: stabilize 14 for hppa
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: keyword 14 for ~hppa
Native bootstrap of sys-devel/gcc-14.2.1_p20241221 succeeded. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946647 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add bootstrap binary for hppa
This is still using the stage3 from before (stage3-amd64-hardened-systemd-20241214T201851Z) although with tree state this time at: ``` Timestamp of repository gentoo: Tue, 31 Dec 2024 14:03:40 +0000 Head commit of repository gentoo: db8e97771bd345dc8a801b7a056f86b4ddb43953 ``` I didn't use `crossdev -S` and sed out ~hppa in make.conf this time accidentally because of a script change I forgot to make, but I don't think it matters as latest glibc + gcc are already stable fortunately. Interestingly, when I tried this last (HPPA was the first arch I tried when manually doing the ada-bootstrap work for non-amd64), it failed w/ gen_il-main in finalization, but this time, it seems to have at least got further... There were some HPPA fixes Dave committed on the 14 branch between 14.2.1_p20241116 (previous attempt) and 14.2.1_p20241221 (this one), so that must be it, or it's that I'd made some error before as the eclass changes and script didn't exist at that point and I was trying stuff adhoc. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946647 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: find BINPKG automatically
For HPPA, the version is going to be newer and it's easier to do this than hardcode another value. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946647 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: Stabilize 14 ppc, #947257
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: Stabilize 14 ppc64, #947257
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: Stabilize 14 amd64, #947257
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Jakov Smolić · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: keyword 14 for ~riscv
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/946644 Signed-off-by: Jakov Smolić <jsmolic@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add bootstrap binaries for loong, riscv, s390*
Same details as cae8f6ff8f9a857ba3a07371d6b2d5d8996afb5f although I built it at the same time as amd64 (see a73baf031bc6e4b613ae181491fedfa3e8437232). This one was a bit delayed as wasn't included in the first batch because they're pure ~arch (TODO: find a way to handle that more nicely in the script to use stable for stable arches, and not otherwise; could grep arches.desc?) We have alpha, hppa, mips, m68k, and x86 left. m68k wasn't done yet because its current GCC is 13 still b/c of a bootstrap failure. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: destabilize 14 for ~amd64
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: keyword 14 for amd64
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add amd64 binary too for 14
Same details as in cae8f6ff8f9a857ba3a07371d6b2d5d8996afb5f for how it was built, but with tree state on 17th November 2024 and not built w/ crossdev. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: keyword 14 for ~ppc, ~ppc64
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: keyword 14 for ~sparc
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: keyword 14 for ~arm
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: handle arches where we have multiple tarballs available
Otherwise, we might have ${A} containing more than one and then we unpack the last one listed (which isn't necessarily right at all) and also fail w/ wrong number of args to dosym. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: fix WhitespaceFound
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: add 14
This adds bootstrap tarballs for GNAT for the following platforms: * aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu * armv6j-softfp-linux-gnueabi * armv6j-unknown-linux-gnueabihf * armv7a-softfp-linux-gnueabi * armv7a-unknown-linux-gnueabihf * powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu * powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu * powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu * sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu More are planned (like HPPA, but I had an issue there when using the built tarball; I don't think the tarball was to blame, rather some deeper issue needing investigation) but this feels like a decent set to start with. We should also of course build a fresh one for amd64 and also x86. They were built using a script [0] using stage3-amd64-hardened-systemd-20241214T201851Z.tar.xz with ::gentoo state around 16th November 2024 (I say "around" as I synced in-between to get an eclass fix). NOTE: I've only added ~arm64 for now as I've tested the binary there to bootstrap GNAT natively. I'll add other keywords once tested. [0] https://github.com/thesamesam/sam-gentoo-scripts/blob/91558fb51c56a661d6f374507888ff67725ca660/build-ada-bootstraps Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: stabilize 0_p2021-r1 for amd64, x86
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: disable libitm too
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: try harder to strip flags
I can't reproduce the failure reported but let's try this. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940599 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: more PATH fixes
I copied the wrong one out of chroot :( Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940598 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: disable more unnecessary options
Like we do for the JIT build in toolchain.eclass. Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: fix setting PATH harder
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940584 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: try harder to get PATH right
... to find the bundled gnatmake and friends, as the build system doesn't consistently respect the env var. Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940582 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: export GNATMAKE too
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940575 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: install gcc-config-style symlinks
Needed for the logic in toolchain.eclass to match what we do for sys-devel/gcc. Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: fix deps
Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org> - Repository mirror & CI · gentoo
Merge updates from master - Sam James · gentoo
dev-lang/ada-bootstrap: new package, add 0_p2021
Split dev-lang/gnat-gpl into dev-lang/ada-bootstrap. This ebuild was initially a clone of dev-lang/gnat-gpl-2021-r5 then had some cleanups done, toolchain.eclass use removed, and simplified what it configures/builds/installs. As I mentioned in 799693623d76c89e8b04d2434d0dfece44bb49f9, there were two jobs left -- this fixes the first one: splitting dev-lang/gnat-gpl into its own package which doesn't collide with sys-devel/gcc:10 and also does the least possible work, not with lots of USE, etc.) Some inspiration taken from sys-devel/bpf-toolchain. Considered using the *-toolchain name again but given the purpose of this is *not* just to avoid crossdev use but instead to bootstrap from a binary for Ada, it didn't feel appropriate. (Planned to do this anyway but the issue mentioned in 9732ef3475830dbe289fc80358613e90b612563c pushed me to get on with it now.) Later versions of ada-bootstrap will be our own binaries for both newer GCC as a base (although this is mostly a nice-to-have and to keep things building rather than it being essential, AFAIK) as well as more importantly musl and other arch support. For that future work, see https://bugs.gentoo.org/940471#c1 for a suggestion from Luke A. Guest. That will be tracked in bug #940472. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/547358 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/919667 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940472 Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/940471 Signed-off-by: Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>